no one should.  

No wonder the lady was removed. 

This needs to be removed - your character assault has no bounds does it??  There are names here who you have no right to bring in and try to slander. Again, you know nothing of what you speak girl. You take an unused account on here, use this as your first post and do what?? Go where you have no knowledge or rights to go. You surely must work in that APS field, and enjoy trying to inflict grief on people. What a work of art you are (NOT).

Facts are, Evelyn Schwartz was removed from her home on 11/20/08 NEEDLESSLY. AND APS started their assault 8 months before the problems above for him began. Dean's personal life had nothing to do with his ability to be a great caregiver for 15 yrs. He got into trouble when he met a lying Russian lady who was trying to  use him to get married and become a citizen, to bring her daughter over here from Russia. He got in trouble when he tried to defend his and Evelyn's home from this woman cursing in front of Evelyn. He tore up the marriage license and she started a fight with him, hitting him in the forehead with a remote control. She also tried kicking him in his privates, and when he raised his knee to protect that area, her foot glanced off his leg and she fell and broke her ankle.

If you will google you will see some Russian women are taught this is the fastest way to get a green card. Lying and pointing fingers. So she did. And she also said he went into her apt when he was foolish enough to go over there to try to see her after her daughter had the TPO put out - saying he stole something, which he never entered the apt as video shows. But they stacked all the charges they could on him and he took a plea deal for one yr instead of the many they threatened him with.

I owe you no explanation (but to respond to the 35 people who have already read your trash), and as stated, you trying to put together a bad story all by yourself fabricating things. Yes, i went with him for 3.5 yrs, and when i broke up, he wanted to still see me. I never followed up on the TPO and in fact, we are friends today. As is Linda, we all just went to the movies last week together. See each other regularly, but no, you would not understand how friends are friends -period. We are good people and here you try to do this behind a post where you skew everything and anything.

He did his time for foolishness, and here you are, no name, slandering everyone you wish. How dreadful of a character you must be, how I pity the life you lead (or seem not to have).  No one has hid anything, all is up at our site you detailed. Dean is a good man and Evelyn loved him. See "I need Dean" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ozVE6m28os  15 yrs speaks for itself. He is not on trial here, and if you wish, I can point you to more information (pic of wound by russian on forehead) This post was what Evelyn wanted, what wrongs were done to her by APS. They checked everything out and no wrongs were ever done to her at the hands of others, like you imply.  This is the best you can do? wow I sure would hate to be in your circle of friends. YUCK.

There was nothing found wrong with any bank accounts, money paid to Dean for reimbursement of food, misc household items, and medicines for Evelyn. She loved him and he her. Never was any reason for adult protective service to be involved, except a sister-in-law who had found out he was to inherit the house after being her caregiver for 15 yrs as payment (was not paid during the time) instead of her. So, she didn't like that and started all this - lying all the way.

No gun they accuse him of was found under any search warrant, and all people released from jail are given a physic test. So again, you do not know of what you speak. Just because you are arrested for something does not mean you are guilty. Spending 5 times the years for all the stacked up charges instead of a plea deal is a threat many face. I think plea deals ought to be out-lawed. They proved nothing, they get you on fear because they can.

So should posts that slander others not be permitted without being signed. But, you are not after the truth, not after anything other than trying to show you are right and the world is wrong. Shame on you girl, you sure will get back what you put out, don't you know that? The victim here has been Evelyn, now you are trying to make it Dean and the rest of us. whew........Betty

ps. dont bother posting again, I am not, I was done with your sorry story last time. So have at it, you already cant look any worse than you do.  

The problem is, America is NOT a Democracy - it is a Republic! As our Founding Fathers established, can we keep it?

is being "used" as a tool.  She was a very sweet lady and was in some dire circumstances.  Sad Sad Sad.

THE DEFENDANT HEREIN HAVING, ON A FORMER DAY OF COURT ENTERED PLEA OF GUILTY TO RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY, RC.2913.51 AS CHARGED IN COUNT TWO OF THE INDICTMENT, WAS THIS DAY IN OPEN COURT WITH HIS/HER COUNSEL PRESENT. THEREUPON, THE COURT INQUIRED OF THE SAID DEFENDANT IF HE/SHE HAD ANYTHING TO SAY WHY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE PRONOUNCED AGAINST HIM/HER; AND HAVING NOTHING BUT WHAT HE/SHE HAD ALREADY SAID AND SHOWING NO GOOD AND SUFFICIENT CAUSE WHY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE PRONOUNCED. IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED BY THE COURT THAT SAID DEFENDANT, DEAN MARINPIETRI, IS SENTENCED TO THE CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, CHILLICOTHE, OHIO FOR TERM OF ONE (1) YEAR TO RUN CONCURRENT WITH CASE CR-212188

Good night.

sleep well

posting.  Stay tuned.  There is ALWAY something here...I miss riding the rapid transits and the choo-choo trains;

I wondered when your

Normal
0


Malevolence would drive you to change the subject matter of the wrong done to Evelyn and make it all about dean.  ok

many years ago dean got himself into a situation involving a woman who knew how to manipulate the system........... he was forced into the criminal system on the heels of a pack of lies and deceit......  dean being not very worldly and completely immotional in his thinking ran away from that.   Not too long after, the cops got on his tail and he did some bad stuff trying to get away.  that cost him dearly.....  nearly 15 years of his young life.

so what have we said here?  is dean a violent recidivist felon?  no.  he is a guy that thinks with his little head and occassionally through emotion.   how many tens of millions of people think similarly?  since dean got past all that and with only a couple of exceptions associated with his persistent thinking with his little head dean has stabilized his life.  he owes much of that to Evelyn Schwartz and the affection that grew between them for nearly 15 years before all this problem began is at the center of the overall controversy.  It is my understanding from Evelyn and all their friends that dean was devoted to Evelyn and was very protective of her.

enter the APS.  they made a nusance out of themselves very early on in 2008 and Evelyn told them she didn't want them coming back.  Dean of course enforced Evelyn's mandate.  This act really pissed off the APS and the Mayfield Heights police who accompanied them to Evelyns house.  they really hated it when they threatened dean for him to threaten them back........   in fact they hated it so much that they layed in wait just looking for a reason to get dean out of the way so the APS could have its way with Evelyn (now that they accomplished that.. we know why Eve needed protecting).

now that generally gets you to the problem that developed for Evelyn...... and dean.  While betty has not published all the facts and documents related to deans troubles, when she does you will see that the facts support the story i just told you.  the story that you have told is the claims made by the cops and aps that resulted in a stack of contrived criminal charges that was too big to risk losing to.   therefore, dean did make a plea agreement.   while it is true that in order to get the 1yr plea he had to adimit to wrongdoing.........  in these times that doesn't mean he did wrong.  the only thing that dean actually did was go to the russians apartment building.  i am sure, from being privy to the facts as they unfolded that he didn't have an evil intent.....  i am pretty sure he was trying to patch up his relationship with her......  of course i can't know that but it makes sense to me that he believed that if he patched things up with the russian the problem would go away..... which it would.

there are many facts that you dont' have access to at this time...... but i suppose it is too much to ask that you reserve your venom for when you actually do have facts.......  what you published is one side of a controversy..........  that isnt' a fact..... that is a claim.

for now....... lets talk about the facts associated with Evelyn Schwartz horrific last two years.  Betty will eventually publish all the facts related to deans problems...... but that is another story

oh please, sign your work

william duff

today

When I seen bill's post, figured I would answer him and put up the pic of dean's injury from being hit with the remote control from Azada. Altho, those with a closed mind will not take any notice, just for the record. That and Eve's avidavit - i could post that too, but, hey, we are not on trail here. It just LOOKS that way, shaking head.

Smile, Betty

The problem is, America is NOT a Democracy - it is a Republic! As our Founding Fathers established, can we keep it?

savcash ,

I read some of the information that you provided, watched the video, read the above information, and also read the paperwork that was attached to this blog's link.

The above information states that you, Betty Brown, filed an anti-stalking charge against the caregiver, Dean.  Two other ladies , Linda Jones and Azada Athmedov, also filed anti-stalking and protection orders against Dean - all in a short period of time.

Anti-stalking is a very serious allegation, which basically means you and two other ladies were all fearful for your lives and went to the police because of the fear.

I am not taking sides with either issue, but I would like to know if there were allegations made against Dean and any alleged abuse towards Evelyn?

Also, just out of curiosity, did the family member that stepped in and caused the removal of Evelyn from her home, ever provide any care or assitance for Evelyn prior to the removal?

-

crazy, not so bad as those who feel they need to hide behind initials and handles, calling others (added bill now too?? whew :(  violent without a shred of proof.  and no, you do not need to hide, as all the people on facebook and several other sites never feel the need. If you are not slamming people and doing wrong, no need at all. Altho there are hundreds of BB in Ohio, I freely gave full information when I signed up over a year ago to a link to my site in my profile along with my full name. If you look me up, you will find ateammasters.com Betty Brown, Chief Executive Officer, A Team Masters Casket store - so no, no need to hide at all, as many of us do not.

Where is Dean now? Gee, he did a year behind bars because of some "player/user" using him and then adding the 'system' being crooked.  The sister in law caused the house he worked for that Evelyn left him in her will as a thank you for being her care giver of 15 years -to be sold by a guardian. That man took a home valued at $90,000.00 and sold it in 2 months for $46,000.00 in Mayfield hts -unheard of - prob a buddy. But that robbery from Dean and Evelyn (as the guardian went thru that and all of her savings and CD and certificates of dep. in just 15 months) was evil.  Evil also in needing to put Eve on Medicade in Nov to pay for her nursing home care. Something I am sure she is still rolling over in her grave about - as proud a woman as she was. Having the tax payers pick up a tab, when she had it all under control.

So, the house is gone - his 'auntie' as she was proud to have us all call her, dies after only seeing her the night before she passed away. So he lost everything for that mistake of falling in love with a stranger - who used him badly - and he paid a very dear price for that lying woman. And here you are, trying to slander him more.

He has good friends tho - and we manged to save his home contents (some of them anyway) for him, and he is picking himself up off the ground - he had a 5 way bypass 11/06/08 - so he is building his life back up.

As one does when handed a raw deal, Betty

PS>OH, where is he?? for now, just fresh out of jail, instead of being homeless as another might be, he is renting (after a couple gratis months) the bedroom across the kitchen in my home; starting next month if he doesn't find a house he wants. Part of his funds wasted on the lawyer needlessly as well, but he has enough left hopefully to put a nice deposit down, to find a nice place, and is looking.

Friends are like family, but you need to know someone worth helping and know they would do the same for you if needed .  Bet you ---- naw, won't go there, no need, your reflection shows all over the place.

ps. Nope, in answer to the other post, the page should be driven down, there is no potential danger. None more than if you go swimming and you might drown - or if you go horse back riding and can fall off, none more then if you get in you car and drive across town. When you wish to live your life based upon fears you make up, and lies you want to believe, you will cause yourself to become ill. Have at it, not for us normal Americans.

Quote of http://www.countygrandjury.org I am quoting however this is the most eloquent way for me to describe why after 30 years
I am still in this fight:
"I didn't sally forth looking for dragons to slay. The dragon came to me. He came with a lie, and either you oppose a lie, or you become a liar. You can kid yourself and say I'm only going along because they have all the guns, but day by day, year by year, your integrity erodes. Finally, you become like the tyrants: just one more liar." Franklin Sanders

The problem is, America is NOT a Democracy - it is a Republic! As our Founding Fathers established, can we keep it?

'nuff said.

people are smart not to reveal their names to you angry whack jobs.

did not start out that way, but after ten years they came upon an agreement. And the fact she loved him and visa versa for him meant they both were happy living out the lives he and she wanted. She suffered none until aps got involved. And of course, the sister in law when she found out her name had been removed from the will and his added for the house. And he didn't just live there, it was his house, he kept it up and then had the greenest grass on the whole street. There is no need to be horrified, you can rest your mind. The 3 1/2 yrs I was with Dean, I was over there almost daily and saw first hand how well the house hold worked. Again, you can go to the ohwidow channel on you tube and see about a dozen videos of her and see how smart and classy of a lady she was. She passed her own doctor's exam with flying colors and needed nothing else.

What are we doing here?? I detailed everything and you come back and still try to slant things wrongly.

Whew - tired of this game yet?? You have to have the last word I know, but I already won that bet. I'm done if you are.

And remember, it is not Betty to you =

Mrs. Brown

The problem is, America is NOT a Democracy - it is a Republic! As our Founding Fathers established, can we keep it?

motion dw and debra.

-

does not intimidate me with her bullying tactics,  and attempts to impinge on the freedom of speech. If truth be told's blog should be deleted, no fears. I have copied it in its entirety, and will repost it. I will repost it as often as needed, and maybe other places, too.

I have looked at each inch of this, and see that it is a combination of public record, and also from the websites where Brown Savcash has posted.  It is not made up stuff. 

You should honor that. You should honor your friends here who have tried to keep this a respectible place. (But no common regard for others I have seen in the past from you and gang) I feel so Sorry for all those in your circle.

There are assuming claims, lies and half twisted information. Yes, it is NOT accurate at all.  I can only assume the lies and twisted half truths were written purely for sensationalism, and it’s sad to think that anyone would destroy someone else’s reputation, so thoughtlessly.  Here is the link, the real story of the bullies, starting anyway, to be known. Don't buy into this slanderous thread, written by one who is, well, read below.

http://realneo.us/content/whos-not-telling-truth-lily-miller-or-dw-who-bullying-twisted-thrasher-truth-b-told

But go ahead. I have it and more copied too. Want to have a pissing contest, pfffttttt, have at it. BB

PS then maybe we can follow up and give u as good as u put out - debbie, remember this?  1 call to public records will be a start----Charges have been filed in the pitt bull attack (CRB 019919). The arraignment date is 6/22/10.  cruelty hotline at 216-377-1630 --- to get your name and location, and others too, then can see about you, but of course, like you have done to others, not any full or true story.

The problem is, America is NOT a Democracy - it is a Republic! As our Founding Fathers established, can we keep it?

thanks, savcash, I needed the laugh.

is what you display is this thread, Lack of ETHICS AND (knowledge of any) LAWS just so you both  (or 3) know-----copy---

Defamation is of two kinds: Libel and Slander. Defamation is a tort (civil wrong) while slander or libel are allegations.

LIBEL

According to the American and English Encyclopedia of Law, a libel is a malicious defamation expressed either by writing or printing, or by signs, pictures, effigies or the like; tending to blacken the memory of one who is dead or impeach the honesty, integrity, virtue or reputation, or to publish the natural or alleged defects of one who is alive and thereby expose him to public hatred, contempt, ridicule; or to cause him to be shunned or avoided, or to injure him in his office, business or occupation.
Libel may be committed by mere insinuation. Also, allegory and irony may be libelous. The following list of words from the Scripps-Howard Synopsis of the Law of Libel and the Right to Privacy by Bruce W. Stanford are ‘red flag’ words that may lead to libelous suits if not handled carefully in news stories:

a)- Jekyll-Hyde personality
b)- Ku Klux Klan
c)- Peeping Tom
d)- Illegitimate
e)- Plagiarist
f)- Illicit relations
g)- Humbug
h)- Ex-convict
i)- Bribery
j)- Hypocrite
k)- Drug addict
l)- Defaulter
m)- Double-crosser
n)- Altered records……etc.

Damages resulting from libel suits may be of three kinds:
a)- General(when injury is recognized as the natural consequence of such publication and proof of injury to reputation is given)
b)- Special (when the plaintiff can prove particular loss)
c)- Punitive/Exemplary (inflicted as punishment for proved malice by the offending publication)

Defenses against libel are of five kinds:
a)- Truth/Justification
b)- Privilege
c)- Fair comment without malice (protects expressions of opinions on public interest matters)
d)- Absence of malice
e)- Prompt publication of retraction by newspaper in which the "offending news" appeared

Slander is a form of action where defamatory meaning comes from spoken words or gestures.

There are some important distinctions between slander and libel:
1. Libel, if it could cause a breach of peace is both a crime and a tort
2. The injured party need not show any actual financial loss in libel. The court presumes damages. Slander however requires proof of monetary loss (called special damages), except in four cases:
a)- a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment
b)- a contagious disease which might prevent others form associating with the plaintiff (applicant)
c)- adultery relating to a woman or girl
d)- words which belittle a man in relation to his office, business or profession.

CONFIDENTIALITY
Journalists are bound by a code of ethics that does not allow them to reveal their sources of news. But nowadays journalistic defendants in libel actions are handicapped by the growing inclination of judges to grant plaintiff requests that they be compelled to reveal their sources of information. Thus journalists have to arm themselves with rules that allow them to thoughtfully deal with confidential sources. It is wrong to argue that stories such as Watergate would have remained buried if it had not been for some ‘deep throat’ source.

COPYRIGHT
News cannot be copyrighted, but the actual wording of an account of the event can. A newspaper that wishes to rewrite or quote a copyrighted article appearing in another publication either buys the copyrighting privileges or requests permission to quote. Credit must be given to the original source. If the copyright is purchased, then the credit line appears at the top of the article. Articles in magazines and books are often copyrighted but newspapers are careful in quoting such material in order to steer clear of violating copyright privileges.

Duration of Copyright
The time period till which the copyright rules are valid depends on whether the work is published during or after the lifetime of the author, or whether the work is a photograph. For works published during the author’s lifetime, copyright runs for the life of the author plus 50 years from the end of the calendar year in which he/she died. Works published after the death of the author, copyright runs for 50 years from the end of the calendar year in which the work is published. For photographs, copyright runs for 50 years from the end of the calendar year in which the photograph was first published.
 

Infringement
If any substantial part of the copyright work is reproduced without the permission of the copyright owner, infringement occurs.
 

Remedies for infringement
Remedies include:
1. an injunction, i.e. a court order that prevents the infringer from repeating the breach of copyright. Repeating the infringement results in contempt of court.
2. damages, wherein the copyright owner seeks to recover the money he/she has lost by the infringement.
3. an account of profits, wherein the true owner claims an amount of profit made by the infringer, not the value of the infringing material.
4. criminal prosecution

REPORTORIAL ETHICS
A student of journalism is encouraged to be as open-minded and objective as possible. This is to prepare him/her to be free of bias and prejudices, conscious or unconscious. The reporter should be aware of the importance of stereotypes, taboos, superstitions and other factors influencing values and opinions. A reporter's power is something that has the ability to draft a certain mindset in people. Thus integrity, accuracy and objectivity, and fair play are needed in high doses.
 

Responsibility: To serve general welfare and the public’s right to know is the prime mission of the mass media. Journalists who use the media and their professional status for their own selfish needs violate a high trust.
 

Freebies and Payolas: Reporters covering large meetings and events have access to a whole lot of material advantages and necessities such as gifts, favours, free travel, special treatment and privileges. Newspapers have different opinions about the limit to which these ‘freebies’ can be accepted by the reporter without letting them bias his/her reporting in favour of the party offering these freebies.

The Society of Professional Journalists, Sigma Delta Chi, has a code of ethics as follows:
"The Society of Professional Journalists, Sigma Delta Chi, believes the duty of journalists is to serve the truth.
We believe the agencies of mass communication are carriers of public discussion and information, acting on their Constitutional mandate and freedom to learn and report the facts.
We believe in public enlightenment as the forerunner of justice, and in our constitutional role to seek the truth as a part of the public’s right to know the truth.
We believe those responsibilities carry obligations that require journalists to perform with intelligence, objectivity, accuracy and fairness."

Readings

http://www.peoi.org/Courses/Coursesen/mass/mass8.html

------------------

The punishment for these offenses is a fine of between $500 and $1,000, with some of the more serious allegations also punishable by up to a year in jail. Id. at 2739.99

1. “Libel is a false or malicious unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, or effigy or other fixed representation to the eye, which exposes any person to public hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or which tends to deprive him of public confidence, or to injure him in his occupation, or any malicious publication as aforesaid, designed to blacken or vilify the memory of one who is dead, and tending to scandalize his surviving relatives or friends.” 21 Okla. Stat. § 771 (2005). It is not, however, necessary that anyone actually read or otherwise learn of the libel for a conviction to be secured; mere exposure to the possibility of being read by another person is enough. Id. at 776.

    

    

2. Any person who makes a libel, willfully publishes one or willfully or knowingly aids in the making of a libel may be punished by up to one year in jail and/or a fine of $1,000 (and shall be liable in civil court to the injured party). Id. at 773.

[//]

Having fun yet?  He who laughs last, laughs loudest. Oh, and another might be, who has the best lawyer, the price for defending your actions HERE will be perhaps, something you will remember too. Removing it* this thread and others like it; will go along way I am sure.  Betty