Take a look at innerbelt discussion on "WE WANNABE a green city on a blue lake" here:
http://www.gcbl.org/planning/innerbelt/urban-design-land-development-and-the-innerbelt#comment-113 [1]
I have no opinion yet on Pendergast's suggested routing - but applaud the time and energy of his efforts.
I agree with Susan Miller regarding the poster’s identity - Pendergast’s statement regarding his preferred anonymity - his saying that he needs to be anonymous because he is wearing "several hats" - might mean that Pendergast owns property - or has some other conflict with objectivity - along one route or the other and thus has a bias that needs to be known.
If you want to make positive change, shouldn’t you have the courage of your convictions?
Maybe not - considering the recent Supreme Court decision regarding the public employee from California.
Links:
[1] http://www.gcbl.org/planning/innerbelt/urban-design-land-development-and-the-innerbelt#comment-113