EXPAND SIN to CASINO TOO - Guest Editorial to Realneo

Submitted by Jeff Buster on Thu, 05/01/2014 - 19:41.

 I got an email from Dan Gilbert last week.    Dan said that Casinos  need the sin tax too.  

Dan should know because Dan owns a casino and a basketball team.    Dan is right, Issue 7 will only give sin tax money to football, baseball, and hockey.  No. Not Hockey, basketball.  Sorry.
 
But it’s  clearly unfair to only give public sin tax money to public ball game venues. 
 
 Jobs are jobs and one man’s ball sport is another man’s black jack.   Or slot machine.
 
Horseshoe Casino is stuck in the old Higbies building.  Clearly Forest City and Mr. Gilbert can’t keep that antique venue up without help from sinners countywide – even countrywide.    Why shouldn’t the casino get sin money too?
 
Upkeep is Upkeep.   Fair is Fair.
 
The casino is there for us sinners night and day – never shuts – 24/7/365 with jobs for slot machine repairmen,  cleaners,  drink makers, croupiers, and the Brinks truck drivers who strain their backs to carry away the cash.    Casinos are warm in the winter and cool in the summer.   
 
Compare the casino’s year around availability to the North East Ohio community (casino has nice overhead walkway) – right on Public Square -  with the not- so-much availability of the Browns Stadium (doesn’t have overhead walkway),  Wahoo Field (has overhead walkway), and the place Le Braun left (has underground walkway).   5.3.14 correction - see image above - Le Braun has overhead walkways from parking lots too.
 
That’s why the Casino must be included in Issue 7.   Sin is what they do at the Casino, they must get some of the free tax upkeep money too. 
 
Write in your Vote to EXPAND ISSUE 7 to include Casino maintenance.     The Plain Dealer editorial board endorses this wise expansion of the sin tax.    Don’t be confused.
 
Thanks Dan for the head’s up.   GO TEAMs  Go CASINO!
AttachmentSize
aerial_sin_tax_walkway_to_basket_14842504-mmmain.jpg85.42 KB
( categories: )

This issue is the absurdity

This issue is the absurdity of absurdities. Let me get this straight: the purpose of the Sin Tax is to gouge those who purchase alcohol and cigarettes not because anyone is trying to discourage consumption but rather so the County can use that money to pay for sports stadiums that do not produce anything but a fleeting moment witnessing the passing of a football, the dribbling of a basketball and the throwing of a baseball so that such a minute tidbit of diversion can be enjoyed by all. The stupidity of this proposition is enough to make your head spin even though the spin doctors advocating passage of this nonsense are already doing a pretty good job of hypnotizing the voters to actually consider supporting it. At least the Robber Barons of the previous centuries provided something tangible such as oil, steel, railroads etcetera. These team owners do not even provide one tangible thing that could ever be considered with the term “value added.” Almost everyone discusses this “enterprise” as though it is the same thing as industry {which it is not}. The price of admission is essentially a voluntary tax paid by those who can afford it to pay those who don’t need it. If this isn’t a transfer of wealth I don’t know what is.

The real outrage here is the fact that taxes on alcohol and cigarettes will not be used to aid in the reduction of addiction {hence the reference to “sin”} but rather to stuff the pockets of all three teams who could easily afford to pay for the repairs themselves. The vote was rammed through the last time {under somewhat suspicious circumstances} and hear we go again. But this time...not so fast! We the voters of Cuyahoga County are going to fight the proponents on this one and we don't care if the teams up and go somewhere else {please see my views on entertainment below} because quite frankly there are simply more important things than sports and the unearned money that comes with it. Those in public office who are too stupid and lazy to find other ways to grow a major American city need to resign and leave their self-seeking political ambitions on the scrapheap of history. Don’t ever let it be said that this was time when the tide ran out on Cuyahoga County but rather was the time when the voters rose up to welcome the rising tide of change and rebuked this pathetic paradigm our previous elected leaders embraced. Let the battle be joined.

And now to the real underlying issue at hand:

One of the most disturbing facts about our capitalist nation is the misappropriation of funds directed to the salaries of entertainers. Everyone should agree that the value an athlete, movie star, talk-show host, team-owner, etcetera brings to the average citizen is very small. Granted, they do offer a minuscule of diversion from our daily trials and tribulations as did the jesters in the king's court during the middle ages. But to allow these entertainers to horde such great amounts of wealth at the expense of more benevolent societal programs is unacceptable. They do not provide a product or a service so why are they rewarded as such?

Our society is also subjected to the "profound wisdom" of these people because it equates wealth with influence. Perhaps a solution to this problem and a alternative to defeated school levies, crumbling infrastructures, as well as all the programs established to help feed, clothe and shelter those who cannot help themselves would be to tax this undeserved wealth. Entertainers could keep 1% of the gross earnings reaped from their endeavor and 99% could be deposited into the public coffers.

The old ideas of the redistribution of wealth have failed, and it is time to adapt to modern-day preferences. People put their money into entertainment above everything else; isn't it time to tap that wealth? Does anyone think this will reduce the quality of entertainment? It seems to me that when entertainers received less income, the quality was much higher.