Doctors at University Hospitals Should Turn In Their Licenses to Practice Medicine, as Hypocrits

Submitted by Norm Roulet on Wed, 08/11/2010 - 11:25.

The Hippocratic Oath is an oath historically taken by doctors swearing to practice medicine ethically.

As they do not practice medicine ethically, all Doctors at University Hospitals Must Turn In Their Licenses to Practice Medicine - including my Father - as they do more harm than good as they pollute this community with soot from burning coal that is unnecessary and that causes certain harm and death to area citizens - especially the young, old, poor, black and weak... and these supposed "doctors" know that very well now.

These "doctors" seem to instead take the hypocritical oath every day on the way to work. Being a doctor who kills is certainly the ultimate hypocrisy.

Hypocrisy is the act of pretending to have beliefs, opinions, virtues, feelings, qualities, or standards that one does not actually have. Hypocrisy involves the deception of others and is thus a kind of lie.

The leadership of UH will rot in hell. For their "doctors", I hear WalMart by MIttal in Steelyard Commons is hiring... work there until you get cancer and then retire to Ireland...

Modern Version

A widely used modern version of the traditional oath was penned in 1964 by Dr. Louis Lasagna, former Principal of the Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences and Academic Dean of the School of Medicine at Tufts University:

I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant:

I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow.

I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.

I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife or the chemist's drug.

I will not be ashamed to say "I know not," nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient's recovery.

I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given to me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.

I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person's family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.

I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.

I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm.

If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.

AttachmentSize
424px-HippocraticOath.jpg78.86 KB
UNConventionRightCHild650.JPG154.5 KB

Dear UH Friends

UH development

Norm Roulet <norm [dot] roulet [at] gmail [dot] com> Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:48 AM
To: Robert Daroff <robert [dot] daroff [at] case [dot] edu>, Peter Whitehouse <peter [dot] whitehouse [at] case [dot] edu>

Bob,

You, Whitehouse, Zenty and my dad should be the first to go.... http://realneo.us/content/doctors-university-hospitals-should-turn-their-licenses-practice-medicine-hypocrits

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Robert Daroff <robert [dot] daroff [at] case [dot] edu> wrote:

Dear Norm,
As per my voicemail to you, your email evaporated out of my computer, but fortunately after I copied it. Please resend it for my records.

Unfortunately, I am totally out of the loop, and know nothing about the steam plant or its developers, and can't be of any help to you.
I imagine it is a joint venture involving all the players in University Circle. Commissioner Jones should be able to assist you in identifying the leadership of the project.

As an aside, I can't imagine that any UH doctors are involved in the campus steam plant. I understand it to be under  UH-Case-UCI ownership, but I'm not certain.
Sorry that I can't be of help.
Bob

Robert B. Daroff, M.D.
Associate Dean of Development
Development and Alumni Relations
Professor and Chair Emeritus
Department of Neurology
Case Western Reserve University
School of Medicine, Room T108
10900 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, OH 44106-4923
Phone  216-368-2500
Fax       216-368-4613



University Hospitals development causing the family problems

Norm Roulet <norm [dot] roulet [at] gmail [dot] com> Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:20 PM
To: Robert Daroff <robert [dot] daroff [at] case [dot] edu>

Dear Dr. Daroff,

I trust you are well.

My family and a team of professionals are working with Cuyahoga County Commissioner Jones to advance a $20 million economic and workforce development initiative for this region that is focused on information technology and local foods. This advances the technology work I introduced to you and the UH CIO at lunch, nearly a decade ago - one aspect of that is a social network I launched here 5 years ago, called REALNEO - http://realneo.us.

Related to this, my family has invested in real estate and development planning in the area east of University Hospitals, in Cleveland and East Cleveland, where my wife and I have renovated an historic home and reside, and where we intend to grow parts of the emerging local foods economy.

While all honest, intelligent leadership in the community is supportive of our efforts, the leadership planning development of University Hospitals, Case, University Circle and our neighborhoods of Cleveland and East Cleveland have been dishonest in their planning, and have lied to citizens, including my family, to protect interests planning to build a steam generation plant in my neighborhood, at the corner of Euclid Avenue and Lakeview.

The partnership planning to build this powerplant appears to be the same as or similar to the group of UH doctors operating the steam generation plant at University Hospitals now, although I do not know that for a fact, or any real deatials about the project, because we have been deceived.

I am working through the people who have deceived our family, to determine who is ultimately responsible for the planning of this facility. I would appreciate your assistance in determining this, and arranging a meeting to allow my family and the public to know what is planned in our neighborhod, so we may plan our lives and private investments accordingly.

You may call me at 440-220-0919 or email norm [at] realneo [dot] us and we can schedule a time to get together with my parents, who have $100,000s at risk here, and feel quite distressed by our treatment by a community they trusted.

Best regards,

Norm Roulet

--
Norm Roulet
ICEarth - realNEO - real coop
norm [at] realneo [dot] us
216-688-5221

Disrupt IT

Threat of harassment lawsuit from UH - 神風

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.
He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it" - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

UH development

Norm Roulet <norm [dot] roulet [at] gmail [dot] com> Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:21 PM
To:

You are heading for far worse.


On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:07 PM, X wrote:

He's heading for an harressment suit


Hard ot sue someone on a suicide mission, which is the only way to take on corrupt leadership and pollution here

.com-i-Kazi

The Kamikaze (神風, common translation: "divine wind")

Disrupt IT

United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child

At the EPA hearing regarding the licensing of MCCO to continue burning coal in University Circle, a citizen testified against burning coal and polluting our neighborhood and submitted into her record the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, with great impact and presence

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (commonly abbreviated as the CRC, CROC, or UNCRC) is a human rights treaty setting out the civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights of children. The Convention generally defines a child as any human being under the age of eighteen, unless an earlier age of majority is recognized by a country's law.

Nations that ratify this convention are bound to it by international law. Compliance is monitored by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child which is composed of members from countries around the world. Once a year, the Committee submits a report to the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly, which also hears a statement from the CRC Chair, and the Assembly adopts a Resolution on the Rights of the Child.

Governments of countries that have ratified the Convention are required to report to, and appear before, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child periodically to be examined on their progress with regards to the advancement of the implementation of the Convention and the status of child rights in their country. Their reports and the committee's written views and concerns are available on the committee's website.

The United Nations General Assembly adopted the Conpootion and opened it for signature on 20 November 1989 (the 30th anniversary of its Declaration of the Rights of the Child). It came into force on 2 September 1990, after it was ratified by the required number of nations. As of November 2009, 194 countries have ratified it including every member of the United Nations except Somalia and the United States. Somalia's cabinet ministers have announced plans to ratify the treaty.

Contents

The Convention deals with the child-specific needs and rights. It requires that states act in the best interests of the child. This approach is different from the common law approach found in many countries that had previously treated children and wives as possessions or chattels, ownership of which was often argued over in family disputes.

The preemption doctrine requires the Federal Government to have an established and pervasive pattern of regulation in the subject matter at issue.

In many jurisdictions, properly implementing the Convention requires an overhaul of child custody and guardianship laws, or, at the very least, a creative approach within the existing laws. The Convention acknowledges that every child has certain basic rights, including the right to life, his or her own name and identity, to be raised by his or her parents within a family or cultural grouping and have a relationship with both parents, even if they are separated.

The Convention obliges states to allow parents to exercise their parental responsibilities. The Convention also acknowledges that children have the right to express their opinions and to have those opinions heard and acted upon when appropriate, to be protected from abuse or exploitation, to have their privacy protected and requires that their lives not be subject to excessive interference.

The Convention also obliges signatory states to provide separate legal representation for a child in any judicial dispute concerning their care and asks that the child's viewpoint be heard in such cases. The Convention forbids capital punishment for children.

In its General Comment 8 (2000) the Committee on the Rights of the Child stated that there was an "obligation of all States parties to move quickly to prohibit and eliminate all corporal punishment and all other cruel or degrading forms of punishment of children". Article 19 of the Convention states that State Parties must "take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social and educational measures to protect the child from all forms of physical or mental violence", but makes no explicit reference to corporal punishment.

The European Court of Human Rights has made reference to the Convention when interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights.

Disrupt IT