Work for a newspaper online is not covered by jurisdictional clauses which cover newspaper work
Submitted by Norm Roulet on Sat, 07/15/2006 - 10:17.
For those who find interesting the issues of newspapers versus internet based news, even when provided by the same organization - like the Cleveland Plain Dealer and Cleveland.com are both owned by Advance Communications - Jones Day was able to arbitrate that the on-line product workers were not covered by union contracts negotiated for the newspaper product - I believe the Plain Dealer if set up the same way...
|
Experience Details |
-->
Related Services
Professional Representation
|
Client(s): Fresno Bee Newspaper, a publication of McClatchy Newspapers |
Representation: Labor Arbitration Involving Work Jurisdiction Issue
Principal Professional(s): Robert Louis Ford
Lead Practice(s): Collective Bargaining, Contract Enforcement & Union Organizing
Industry(s): Media
Summary: The Fresno Bee has an online product, Fresnobee.com, which provides news and a host of other services over the internet. Work on this product is performed in a separate department at the Fresno Bee and employees in that department are not represented by a union. The Newspaper Guild claimed in its grievance that Guild-represented employees should be assigned the work because the on line product was really an online newspaper and under the labor contract, newspaper work must be performed by Guild-represented employees. A multiday hearing was held before Arbitrator Alexander Cohn and post-hearing briefs were filed. The Arbitrator denied the grievance and upheld the ompany's position. This decision is of great significance because it is precedent for the proposition that work for a newspaper online product is not covered by jurisdictional clauses which cover newspaper work.
|